9 min read
Axeazy vs UserWay: Small Business Fit
Axeazy vs UserWay for a small business: code level fixes and a dated record against a visitor menu with paid remediation, plus a plain way to pick.
- axeazy vs userway
- userway alternative
- small business accessibility
- code fixes
- accessibility widget
- free accessibility checker
Opening answer
For a small business, Axeazy and UserWay answer different questions. Axeazy changes code in the source, or gives a guided checklist where a direct code change is not offered, and keeps a dated record of scans and fixes. UserWay gives visitors controls on the page, and its paid tiers add automated remediation and monitoring. Pick Axeazy if the job is code level fixes with a record to show. Pick UserWay if the job is visitor controls with little setup, and paid remediation on top.
Axeazy: fixes in the source
Axeazy starts with a free scan. The scan takes about 60 seconds and needs no card. It scans with axe-core and works across 14 fix categories at code level. That scope covers alt text, skip navigation, language attributes, form labels, link and button names, ARIA labels on custom widgets, ARIA attribute validity, keyboard tab order, pinch-to-zoom restrictions, iframe titles, table header structure, and landmark and heading structure.
For a site with a GitHub repo, fixes arrive as a real pull request with a visible diff for owner review. Nothing goes live from that route until the owner reviews it. For WordPress, a free plugin applies exactly three fixes at render time: a skip navigation link, a page language attribute, and an alt text fallback. No account is needed for that plugin.
For Shopify, Axeazy scans the store and gives a guided plain-English checklist for the merchant or theme editor to follow, not an automatic fix or a pull request. For other sites, Axeazy gives computed fix values plus a guided checklist, with no automatic changes to the site.
Colour contrast gets the same owner-first treatment. Axeazy detects a contrast problem and calculates a WCAG-correct colour, but it never applies that colour without owner approval. Every scan and fix is dated, so the reader holds a record of the work over time. Paid plans add PDF reports and weekly monitoring.
The capabilities page lists Starter at $29 a month, Pro at $79 a month, and Agency at $199 a month. The live pricing page shows paid prices only at checkout, with annual billing saving 20 to 25 percent, so check the price at checkout before you buy. Start with Axeazy's free scan and compare Axeazy's pricing page for the plan that fits the site count.
UserWay: visitor controls first
UserWay starts from the visitor side of the page. Visitors can open a menu and adjust how the page looks and reads for them. The feature guide lists a screen reader, contrast controls, bigger text, text spacing, pause animation, hide images, dyslexia friendly fonts, cursor tools, tool tips, page structure, line height, and text align. Those controls help a visitor in the moment, in the browser, without a change to the source by the visitor.
Paid tiers add more than the menu. They add automated remediation that fixes many common issues in real time, with human-in-the-loop oversight and in-platform insight on applied remediations. They add continuous monitoring through the UserWay portal. Monitoring covers up to 10 pages on the first paid tier, up to 50 pages on the second, and up to 100 pages on the third.
Audits and VPAT documents are add-ons, not part of the base widget tiers. Higher tiers add live translation and menu controls. The Litigation Support Program is on annual plans only.
Price needs a direct check. Directory figures for UserWay conflicted in October 2026, with annual figures and monthly figures that do not line up. This draft quotes no UserWay price for that reason. Check UserWay's own pricing page for the current plan, page view unit, and price before you buy. A price from a directory, or from an old review, is not a safe basis for a budget.
Side by side in plain terms
- Job: Axeazy fixes code or gives a guided checklist. UserWay gives visitor controls, with paid remediation added on top.
- Change location: Axeazy changes the source, through a pull request, a WordPress plugin, or a checklist the owner follows. UserWay changes the visitor view in the browser, and its paid remediation applies fixes at load time.
- Record: Axeazy keeps a dated record of scans and fixes, with PDF reports on paid plans. UserWay gives in-platform insight on applied remediations and monitoring through its portal.
- Price unit: Axeazy prices by site and page scope on the capabilities page, with paid prices shown at checkout. UserWay prices by plan tier and page view volume on its own pricing page, so confirm the unit before you compare totals.
- Free step: Axeazy gives a free 60 second scan with no card. UserWay gives a free widget focused on visitor usability, with paid tiers adding remediation and monitoring.
- Human review: Axeazy asks the owner to review a pull request before a fix goes live, and asks for approval before a new colour is applied. UserWay describes human-in-the-loop oversight for its automated remediation.
How to choose
First, name the job in one sentence. Fix the code, give visitors controls, or do both in stages. Second, count the right unit. Sites and pages for Axeazy, and plan tier plus page views for UserWay.
Third, ask for the record. A dated list of fixes, a PDF report, or a monitoring history will matter more in six months than a score today.
Fourth, try the free step before you pay. A free scan shows real issues on the reader's own site, and a free widget shows how visitors use menu controls on that site.
A small site with one owner and no developer fits the Axeazy free scan plus the WordPress plugin, where WordPress is in use, or the guided checklist for Shopify. A small site that wants visitor controls fast, with little setup, fits the UserWay free widget first, then a paid tier if remediation and monitoring are wanted. An agency with client sites should compare Axeazy Agency, for up to 10 sites on the capabilities page, against UserWay tiers by page views and monitoring pages, and ask both for the record each client will receive.
For a fuller price and fit comparison with a different widget vendor, see the earlier article on this blog: Axeazy vs accessiBe: Price, Fixes and Fit.
Common mistakes
One mistake is buying a visitor menu and expecting the source to change. A menu helps visitors adjust a page in the browser. It does not, by itself, rewrite HTML, labels, or heading order in the source. Ask what changes in the code, and when, before you pay.
A second mistake is comparing a monthly headline against an annual total. Axeazy lists monthly figures on its capabilities page, with paid prices shown at checkout and annual saving 20 to 25 percent. UserWay directory figures mix monthly and annual totals. Convert both to a 12 month total, on the same site count and traffic unit, before you decide.
A third mistake is skipping the record. A dated list of scans and fixes, a PDF report, or a monitoring history is the item a client, a buyer, or an attorney will ask for later. A score on one day, with no record behind it, does not show ongoing work.
A fourth mistake is treating a free check as a finished fix. A free scan finds issues. A free widget gives visitors controls. Neither one, on its own, finishes code work across a whole site.
FAQ
Which fits a small business with no developer?
Axeazy fits that reader for code work, because the free scan needs no card, the WordPress plugin needs no account, and the Shopify route is a guided checklist in plain English. UserWay fits that reader for visitor controls, because the free widget needs little setup and the menu is ready for visitors at once. Pick by job: code fixes point to Axeazy, visitor controls point to UserWay, and a site that needs both can stage them in that order.
Does UserWay change my site code?
UserWay describes automated remediation on paid tiers that fixes many common issues in real time, with human-in-the-loop oversight and in-platform insight on applied remediations. The free widget is focused on visitor usability controls, not on that remediation. Ask UserWay, in writing for the reader's own site, what changes in the source, what changes only in the visitor view, and what record of applied remediations the portal will hold.
Does Axeazy change my site without my approval?
No, on the routes described here. A GitHub fix arrives as a pull request with a visible diff for owner review. A new colour for contrast is calculated but never applied without owner approval. A Shopify fix is a guided checklist, not an automatic change, and a WordPress plugin fix applies at render time through a plugin the owner can remove.
What should I ask before I pay either vendor?
Ask what changes in the source, who reviews a fix before it goes live, how price is counted, what happens when traffic rises, and what record you will hold in six months. Ask UserWay for the current price on its own pricing page, and ask Axeazy for the price at checkout, since directory figures conflicted in October 2026 and the live Axeazy pricing page shows paid prices only at checkout. This is general information, not legal advice. If you have received a demand letter or been sued, talk to a qualified attorney.
Can I use both products?
Yes, in stages, and the order should follow the job. Start with a free scan to learn what the code needs, and a free widget to learn how visitors use menu controls. Then pick the paid route that matches the larger gap: code fixes and a dated record, or remediation and monitoring on top of visitor controls. Keep the record from each route in one place, so later work builds on it instead of starting again.
Last checked and sources
Last checked: October 31, 2026.
Sources: UserWay pricing, UserWay widget feature guide, WCAG 2.2, ADA.gov web guidance.
If the job is code level fixes with a dated record, read the honest scope on Axeazy's capabilities page before you choose a plan.